Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Centre’s Post

Supreme court's Advocate on Record Examination: Stretegy No (2) So meanandering aspect of constituionalism is foremost priority of this stretegy. Nearly every listed cases for study and it's orientation in question's framework essentially indicate that the stretegy of subjective topics would be most convincing to avoid the ambiguities and simplified that windings of misplaced interpretation. The pretext : Anyone who is acquaint with English Literature, William Black is familiar introduction. "The Poison Tree" is such collection of poems written by William Black He wrote : I was angry with my Friend I told my wrath, My wrath did End I was angry with my Foe I told it not My wrath did grow Our constitution assembly debate (1935) was such an introspection attended by Forward community ( most of them west looking Indian inside) with presiding chairman bestowed upon B R Ambedkar And drafting of Constitution was full of exceptionalism of utopia. The declaration was by the peoples of fragmented history, distorted cultural aspirations and vision of sovereignty with only hope for Nation of Equality. In India, it is not a problem who wrote what, but if this is written must be curtailed to trustworthy assumptions. We never developed why only certain sections of society writing with no further distribution of Literature. By analogy the Legal field is not an exception of this jarring selectivity . Two questions still pervades us : Why only Brahmins wrote the History and the supreme court always interpretated the Constitution despite the preponderance of Article 226 and High court not subordinate to Supreme Court. The publication is dirty world - V S Naipaul Anyway going through analytical perspective, there are certain selective topics of study (Extracted from book : Oxford University Book on Constitution of India) viz

"A constitution is not a mere lawyers' document, it is a vehicle of life, and its spirit is always the spirit of the age." The foundation of our Republic is a Constitution which was written by those who sacrificed themselves for the independence of the country and the liberation of the society. Today, freedom runs through our veins, but do we remember the Republic as we should? The Constituent Assembly met in a total of 17 sessions and only the draft was considered for 114 days. Scholars and philosophical leaders had deliberated upon the intricacies of societal issues after which, the country was blessed with a well-thought-out constitution and a well-organized republic. Do we remember the hard work done for the republic? Do we remember the penance which was possible under the leadership of Dr. Rajendra Prasad and Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar? While enjoying the freedom given by the Constitution, we must take care of the republic. The word republic should Inspire us towards our duty and responsibility. The credit for our Constitution also goes to some lesser known faces such as BN Rau, the constitutional advisor of the Constitution as well as of S.N. Mookerjee, the chief draftsman, whose ability to put very complex proposals in the simplest language can hardly be matched. The foundation of the country on liberty, equality and fraternity was also made possible by those employees who worked day and night to compile the Constitution. The draft of the Constitution was sharpened by criticism from KV Kamat, Dr PS Deshmukh, Shri Sidhwa, Professor Saxena, KT Shah, Pandit Hridaynath Kunzru and Pandit Thakurdas Bhargava. While Alladi Krishnaswami Iyer and T.T. Chalaya Krishnamachari repeatedly came out in defense of the draft with full wisdom. How can the country forget the presidency of Rajendra Prasad? From the era of rare telephones, we have come to the era of artificial intelligence. There are many challenges before the country, but even today the Constitution is a strong guiding light.The challenge for us is to keep watering the republic with our moral strength. #india #republicday #republic #patriotism #celebration #constitution #festival #linkedinforcreators #linkedin

Introduction to the concept of the Indian Democracy: India’s government is loosely modelled on the British Westminster system. It consists of a president as head of state; an executive headed by the prime minister; a legislature consisting of a parliament with an upper and lower house ( the RAJYA SABHA and LOK SABHA ); and a judiciary with a supreme court at its head. 543 members are elected to the lok sabha through a first – past – the – post general election, held every five years. State representatives are indirectly elected to the Rajya sabha on staggered six – year terms, so every two years around one third are changed , elected by state legislatures. India’s constitution sets out the country’s political code, federal structure, powers of government and guarantees Indian’s rights , including equality before the law and freedom of speech , assembly, movement, and others. The system is complicated by India’s caste system, a hierarchical social structure that divides the Hindu majority into groups, with “ Brahmins” at the top and “Dalit’s “ at the bottom of the society. Last names often indicate to which caste a person belongs Here's a piece of my research regarding Introduction to the concept of Democracy. Stay tuned for more.

Hindu editor K. George under Political line written an article "A costly drive for unity" expressed his views which are totaly misguiding the readers and far away from truth as he expressed: "Even before the dust that he kicked up by “dismissing” the Minister settled, he claimed Prime Minister Modi had a “divine mandate” to spread Sanatana Dharma to the entire world. Not only that, according to Mr. Ravi’s unity vision, “Even if that person says, ‘No I am not part of your family’…as far as I am concerned you are mine, you are us…” Well, those who know history might doubt the wisdom of this thought, whatever philosophy it is couched in." Unity is strength, as they say. From Manipur to Tamil Nadu, and on the question of the Uniform Civil Code, the BJP’s obsession with oneness and discipline is not exactly creating either unity or strength. At least 134 people have been killed in sectarian violence in Manipur that has been going on for two months; in Tamil Nadu, Governor R.N. Ravi announced the dismissal of a Minister in an unprecedented breach of constitutional norms. Union Home Minister Amit Shah asked him to walk back the announcement, but the controversy is far from over. What is common between Manipur and Tamil Nadu? In both States, there are strong cultural and ethnic identities which exist in a delicate balance with regional and national identities. Both States are theatres of an enhanced drive by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its agents towards closer integration with its version of nationalism, clearer categories, labels, and disciplining of people. It means he is advocating for corrupt criminals and for those who are encroaching/capturing the land of India for illegal activities and to disturb the peace. There may be some other reasons with them to discuss the issue with mr. modi bt they vmerely for opposing the https://lnkd.in/dsSjnNUi

My review in Cafe Dissensus Everyday of Devika Rege's debut novel, Quarterlife. It's introductory lines: "Replete with Indian contemporary issues – issues of evolving filial relations, politics, power, caste inequalities and violence - Devika Rege’s debut novel, ‘Quarterlife’ implodes in the reader’s mind because these themes from India are familiar and thinly veiled, yet so well researched that they bring forth a reality that is almost discomforting to confront." https://lnkd.in/gzZmxKce

Bharat India General - My Life truth-Volume VIII-Blogs These Blogs related Notes 1 These blogs were published in 2005/2006/2007 on then various existing portals.  2 At that time, I had been working in UAE Abu Dhabi.  3 Those web portals had been closed long back. 4 Therefore, I searched out those records from my database & hereby repost for information to public.  5 I may not be able to find all blogs, whatever I posted, but would try to locate whatever could be recovered. VIII-MyLifeTruths-08-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/dkVzuqsm Secularism Must Be Discussed Openly To Degenerate Its Misconcept & Establish Its Real Applicable Construction VIII-MyLifeTruths-07-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/dAF_irAH Problems Pending For Gross National Resolutions / Policy Formations – An overall Synopsis For Public Deliberation VIII-MyLifeTruths-06-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/dh6imG-z Fundamental Rights VIII-MyLifeTruths-05-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/dFw84SDb Geelani’s Speech In Kashmir Valley & Slogans Against India VIII-MyLifeTruths-04-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/d5sZ2FS7  Constitution of Bharat / India - Fundamental Duties  VIII-MyLifeTruths-03-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/dqkfKXkM This Portal I Suppose Is For General Improvement of Bharat & Our Societies VIII-MyLifeTruths-02-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/d-URxMC7 COI-Directive Principles of State Policy VIII-MyLifeTruths-01-Suraj Blogs-Till 15.08.2007 https://lnkd.in/daX9eZQH Qualifications Criteria For Bharat / India MP, MLA, Municipality Member, Minister & President Should Be Reviewed To Following Concept: #construction #india #uae #database #abudhabi

Title: "Navigating Grammatical Horizons: Unraveling Varied Dimensions of India's Republic through Prepositions" Certainly! Let's explore varied interpretations for each phrase: 1. **Grammar: "Republic of India"** - **Interpretation:** Signifying a political entity, "Republic of India" conveys the notion that India is characterized by its republican form of government. 2. **Grammar: "Republic in India"** - **Interpretation:** Indicating the presence of a political structure, "Republic in India" implies that there exists a distinct republic within the geographic boundaries of India, perhaps coexisting with other political systems. 3. **Grammar: "Republic to India"** - **Interpretation:** Unusual phrasing may suggest a metaphorical or transformative concept. "Republic to India" could imply a visionary idea or political evolution that India is moving towards. 4. **Grammar: "Republic by India"** - **Interpretation:** Unconventional construction may suggest an active role by India in shaping the concept of republics globally. "Republic by India" could imply India's influence in promoting democratic ideals worldwide. 5. **Grammar: "Republic for India"** - **Interpretation:** Highlighting purpose, "Republic for India" conveys the idea that the republic exists with the primary objective of serving the interests, welfare, or aspirations of the Indian people. 6. **Grammar: "Republic from India"** - **Interpretation:** Unusual construction could imply that the concept of a republic has roots or inspiration originating directly from India, showcasing the country's historical influence on political thought. 7. **Grammar: "Republic on India"** - **Interpretation:** Uncommon phrasing may suggest a nuanced relationship. "Republic on India" could imply an external influence, acknowledgment, or scrutiny of India's political system from an international perspective.

State of Our World: #India Cutting off One’s Nose To Spite One’s Face A learned man in India, Mr. Bibek Debroy, heading the PM’s Economic Advisory Council authored an article in Mint & made a case for 'we the people' to embrace a new Constitution & termed the present Constitution a colonial legacy. He further writes "Much of what we debate begins & ends with the Constitution. A few amendments won't do. We should go back to the drawing board & start from first principles, asking what these words in the Preamble mean now: Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Justice, Liberty and Equality. We the People have to give ourselves a new Constitution." Do Read: https://lnkd.in/gDkmjCp9 Am not a constitutional expert but from the little I know, the Indian constitution is an idealistic document that encapsulates the aspirations of its diverse & free people, to govern themselves & share its bounties as equal partners. From a quick look at Indian Society today it is obvious that we have collectively failed to live up to the high ideals & deliver on the promises. Inspired by the current state of Indian society and its future direction, is Mr. Debroy suggesting that we completely change the core principles enshrined in our constitution; Capitalist from #Socialist; Majoritarian from #Secular; Authoritarian from #Democratic; #Justice For The Highest Bidder; Subjugation Instead of #Liberty and Do we accept that #Inequality is a natural way of life. Talking of Colonial Legacy, the intelligent will take the good parts and leave whats not & many legal luminaries are saying there are many good parts. Or Is Mr. Bibek Debroy suggesting some higher ideals than what are already enshrined? I have a suggestion. Intellectuals should comment on all matters of importance to society in general to make it better but when it comes to specialised subjects like the constitution, how can an economist make such a definitive statement, “We the People have to give ourselves a new Constitution.”   So I urge all intellectuals to think hard about the long term implications of their statements especially those holding public offices. Making definitive statements on complex subjects may serve some narrow agenda or get some media attention but diminishes one’s standing among intellectuals. = = = A Question For the Collegium? Do Read: https://lnkd.in/gSsZ2-Ws The Rockstar Justices from Maharashtra and Tamilnadu, are exemplary but a whole 'Creationism' cottage industry has come up to serve the vested political & economic interests of Indian states & regions. Creationism is Passe in the Court of Public Opinion. It’s time for Nature & Natural Evolution. = = = WHO chief urges countries to unlock power of traditional medicines through science Is It A New Market Development & Commercialisation Opportunity by Pharma? Read More: https://lnkd.in/gZWTaFNg

INTELLECTUALS OF INDIA: Being intellectual in India these days has an irony of pun in it. The 'intellectuals' would rather be non-intellectuals to avoid the snobbery generated by its labelling. The word is slang, both in political and social terms. It suggests intellectuals need to be aware of ground realities despite their academic knowledge. Mostly, leftist scholars and thinkers are the victims of intellectual sarcasm. For that reason, it is often a bitter taunt by the political Right against the political Left. For Prime Minister Modi's "bhagats" and the ruling BJP supporters, intellectuals are often the target of ridicule. Willfully calling somebody an intellectual is to mock the narcissistic nature of an individual who otherwise seems loaded with scholarly intelligence. Intellectualism gets sarcastically ridiculed and criticized. It fails to communicate at the level which ordinary folks can comprehend. The wisdom and idealism of intellectuals remain circulated within the learned community. Either their writing style does not connect with the everyday folks, or the medium they select has a limited audience of those who already agree with them. An example is India's foremost writers and intellectuals, Arundhati Roy. She writes scholarly and forcefully, but her views, assessments and sentiments do not trickle down to change of opinion or to realize the existing truth. -Promod Puri

Apex Court while dismissing PIL filed by Mr. Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay the Apex Court has held that:- 5. We may notice that we have to bear in mind being the Court dealing with the matter under Article 32 of the Constitution, that the Court is tasked with the enforcement of fundamental rights. India, that is ‘Bharat’ in terms of the preamble, is a secular country. In His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and Another 1 , we notice that it was opined “India is a secular State in which there is no State religion” (See para 487). The secular and federal character of the Constitution has found to be among the “basic elements of the constitutional structure” (See para 582). Secularism has been accepted by a Bench of nine learned Judges in the decision reported in S.R. Bommai and Others v. Union of India and Others 2 , as a facet of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therein, this Court, inter alia, declared: 11. The history of any nation cannot haunt the future generations of a nation to the point that succeeding generations become prisoners of the past. The golden principle of fraternity which again is enshrined in the preamble is of the greatest importance and rightfully finds its place in the preamble as a constant reminder to all stakeholders that maintenance of harmony between different sections alone will lead to the imbibing of a true notion of nationhood bonding sections together for the greater good of the nation and finally, establish a sovereign democratic republic. We must constantly remind ourselves that courts of law, as indeed every part of the ‘State’, must be guided by the sublime realisation, that Bharat is a secular nation committed to securing fundamental rights to all sections as contemplated in the Constitution. 12. We are, therefore, of the view that the reliefs which have been sought for should not be granted by this Court acting as the guardian of fundamental rights of all under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and bearing in mind the values which a Court must keep uppermost in its mind - the preamble gives us clear light in this direction. "Let us not break society with such kinds of petitions, please have the country in mind, not any religion", Justice Nagarathna told the petitioner while adding that "there is no bigotry in Hinduism"